to study search History No further version available for comparison

Comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Internet-based Stressmanagment with and without guidance.

Organizational Data

DRKS-ID:
DRKS00005687
Recruitment Status:
Recruiting planned
Date of registration in DRKS:
2014-06-06
Last update in DRKS:
2014-06-06
Registration type:
Prospective

Acronym/abbreviation of the study

GET.ON Stress Role of Support?

URL of the study

https://geton-training.de/stressbewaeltigung.php

Brief summary in lay language

Occupational stress constitutes a risk factor for a variety of psychological and physical disorders. In general, stress is associated with unfavourable health behaviours and leads to loss of productivity at work and affects private life. The "Flexible Internet Training for managing work-related stress" aims to reduce perceived stress and depressive symptoms. It targets employees who are seeking help for coping with personal problems and dealing with difficult emotions. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the online training, which can support participants in recognizing their personal stressors, choosing effective coping strategies and strengthening their abilities to solve personal and work-related problems in a systematic and effective manner. Furthermore, it aims to improve their way of dealing with stress and difficult emotions in occupational and private life. This study will compare three study arms: pure self-help, guided self-help, and a 6-month waiting list control group.

Brief summary in scientific language

Work-related stress is associated with a variety of mental and emotional problems, such as symptoms of depressions, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. This can lead to substantial economic costs due to loss of productivity, absenteeism or inability to work. There is a considerable amount of evidence on traditional face-to-face stress management interventions; however, they are costly, time-consuming and only available for a certain number of people. The aim of the study is to assess the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based self-help stress managment program and a guided self-help version of the same program. N=396 employees experiencing high levels of stress (Perceived Stress Scale ≥ 22) will be randomly allocated into one of three groups: pure self-help, guided self-help or a 6-month waiting list control group. The intervention is based on problem- and emotion-focused stress management according to Lazarus and contains systematic problem solving as well as effective strategies for emotion regulation. Data is collected in a baseline survey, seven weeks and six months after randomization. Primary Outcome is perceived stress.

Health condition or problem studied

Free text:
work-related stress
Healthy volunteers:
No Entry

Interventions, Observational Groups

Arm 1:
intervention group A: Online Training consisting of 7 sessions. Each session will be completed in approximately 45-60 minutes. Four weeks after finishing the training, participants complete an additional booster session. Questionnaires are completed at pre- and posttest (7 weeks), as well as at 6 months follow up.
Arm 2:
intervention group B: Online Training consisting of 7 sessions. Each session will be completed in approximately 45-60 minutes. Participants receive feedback on demand via e-mail from an online coach. Four weeks after finishing the training, participants complete an additional booster session. Questionnaires are completed at pre- and posttest (7 weeks), as well as at 6 months follow up.
Arm 3:
waitlist control group: After 6 months, participants obtain access to the same training as participants of the intervention group A. Questionnaires are completed at pre- and posttest as well as 6 months follow up.

Endpoints

Primary outcome:
Perceived Stress, measured with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10; Cohen, 1983) at Baseline, after the training (7 weeks) and at 6-months follow-up (6-M-FU).
Secondary outcome:
• Emotional exhaustion (Maslach Burnout Inventory, MBI-GS-D, emotional exhaustion scale, Maslach & Jackson, 1981): pre, post (7 weeks), 6-M-FU • Depressive symptoms (CES-D, Hautzinger & Bailer, 1993): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Self-assessed emotional competences (SEK-27, Berking & Znoj, 2008): pre • Dimensions of personality (Big Five Inventory, BFI-10, Rammstedt & John, 2007): pre • Volitional competences (Short Form of the Volitional Components Questionnaire, SSI-36, Forstmeier & Rüddel, 2008; subscales of attentional focusing, self-motivation, goal recollection, forgetfulness prevention, impulse control and initiation control): pre • Self-efficacy (SWE, Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1999): pre • Self-Regulation Scale (SRQ, Schwarzer, 1999): pre • Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D. Bertrams & Dickhäuser, 2009): pre • Therapy motivation questionnaire (FPTM-23, Schulz, Lang, Nübling, & Koch, 2003): pre • Task-related motivational and volitional factors in line with the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA, according to guidelines by Schwarzer et al., 2003): pre • Effort-Reward Imbalance, short version (ERI-S, Siegrist, Wege, Pühlhofer, & Wahrendorf, 2009): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, UWES, Schaufeli, Salanova, González-Romá, & Bakker, 2002): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Quality of life and subjective functioning (Short form health survey, SF-12, Morfeld, Kirchberger, Bullinger): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Quality of life for economic evaluation (EuroQol, Graf, Claes, Greiner, & Uber): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Current occupation (self-development): pre • Cost related to mental and physical impairment (German adaption of Trimbos / iMTA questionnaire for Costs associated with Psychiatric Illness, TiC-P, Van Roijen Hakkaart, 2002): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Dropout reasons (self-development): post • Training satisfaction: self-development based on participants´satisfaction questionnaire (ZUF 8, Schmidt, Lamprecht, Wittmann, 1989) and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ, Attkisson & Zwick, 1982): post • Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ-8, Lerner, Amick, Rogers, Malspeis, Bungay, & Cynn, 2001), measuring the on-the-job impact of chronic health problems (pre) • Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISK, Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007), measuring the abil- ity to cope with adversity (pre) • Internet Affinity Scale (Papacharissi & Rubin, 2000), measuring internet affinity (pre)

Study Design

Purpose:
Prevention
Allocation:
Randomized controlled study
Control:
  • Active control (effective treatment of control group)
  • Control group receives no treatment
Phase:
N/A
Study type:
Interventional
Mechanism of allocation concealment:
No Entry
Blinding:
Yes
Assignment:
Parallel
Sequence generation:
No Entry
Who is blinded:
  • Data analyst

Recruitment

Recruitment Status:
Recruiting planned
Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
No Entry

Recruitment Locations

Recruitment countries:
  • Germany
Number of study centers:
Monocenter study
Recruitment location(s):
  • Other Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Teilnehmer werden über die Forschungswebsite www.geton-training.de rekrutiert/participants are recruited via the research website www.geton-training.de)

Recruitment period and number of participants

Planned study start date:
2014-09-24
Actual study start date:
No Entry
Planned study completion date:
No Entry
Actual Study Completion Date:
No Entry
Target Sample Size:
408
Final Sample Size:
No Entry

Inclusion Criteria

Sex:
All
Minimum Age:
18 Years
Maximum Age:
no maximum age
Additional Inclusion Criteria:
distinct level of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale [PSS-10] ≥ 22), access to the internet, valid e-mail-adress, employed

Exclusion Criteria

- at baseline slightly suicidal (BDI II item 9 > 1), - not willing to sign informed consent, - diagnosed psychosis or dissociative symptoms in the past

Addresses

Primary Sponsor

Address:
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg GET.ON Gesundheitstraining.Online / Innovations-Inkubator
Dr. David Daniel Ebert (Ansprechpartner des Sponsors)
Rotenbleicher Weg 67
21335 Lüneburg
Germany
Telephone:
017616781057
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.leuphana.de/inkubator
Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
Yes

Contact for Scientific Queries

Address:
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg GET.ON Gesundheitstraining.Online / Innovations-Inkubator
David Ebert
Rotenbleicher Weg 67
21335 Lüneburg
Germany
Telephone:
041316777654
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.leuphana.de/inkubator/gesundheit/geton.html

Contact for Public Queries

Address:
Inkubator KT-GET.ONLeuphana Universität Lüneburg
Dipl. Sozialpäd. Torsten Tarnowski
Scharnhorststr. 1
21335 Lüneburg
Germany
Telephone:
04131-677-7651
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
https://www.geton-training.de

Principal Investigator

Address:
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg GET.ON Gesundheitstraining.Online / Innovations-Inkubator
David Ebert
Rotenbleicher Weg 67
21335 Lüneburg
Germany
Telephone:
041316777654
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.leuphana.de/inkubator/gesundheit/geton.html

Sources of Monetary or Material Support

Public funding institutions financed by tax money/Government funding body (German Research Foundation (DFG), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), etc.)

Address:
Investitions-und Förderungsbank Niedersachsen (NBank)
Günther-Wagner-Allee 12-16
30177 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
0511 300310
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.nbank.de

Public funding institutions financed by tax money/Government funding body (German Research Foundation (DFG), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), etc.)

Address:
Barmer GEK
Lichtscheider Str. 89
42285 Wuppertal
Germany
Telephone:
No Entry
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
https://www.barmer-gek.de

Public funding institutions financed by tax money/Government funding body (German Research Foundation (DFG), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), etc.)

Address:
European Union (finanzielle Förderung organisiert über NBank bzw. Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Verkehr
Friedrichwall 1
30159 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
0511300310
Fax:
/
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.nbank.de

Ethics Committee

Address Ethics Committee

Address:
Ethik-Kommission des Fachbereichs Psychologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg [Marburg - Ethik-Kommission des Fachbereichs Psychologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg]
Gutenbergstr. 18
35037 Marburg
Germany
Telephone:
No Entry
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb20/ethikkommission

Vote of leading Ethics Committee

Vote of leading Ethics Committee
Date of ethics committee application:
2014-01-26
Ethics committee number:
Aktenzeichen 2014-05k
Vote of the Ethics Committee:
Approved
Date of the vote:
2014-06-04

Further identification numbers

Other primary registry ID:
No Entry
EudraCT Number:
No Entry
UTN (Universal Trial Number):
No Entry
EUDAMED Number:
No Entry

IPD - Individual Participant Data

Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
No Entry
IPD Sharing Plan:
No Entry

Study protocol and other study documents

Study protocols:
No Entry
Study abstract:
No Entry
Other study documents:
No Entry
Background literature:
No Entry
Related DRKS studies:
No Entry

Publication of study results

Planned publication:
No Entry
Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
Ebert et al. (2014) Study Protocol
Date of first publication of study results:
No Entry
DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
No Entry

Basic reporting

Basic Reporting / Results tables:
No Entry
Brief summary of results:
No Entry