Non contrast-enhanced short-time MRI and conventional CT: Comparison of diagnostic parameters in patients with acute neurological symptoms
Organizational Data
- DRKS-ID:
- DRKS00013356
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study complete
- Date of registration in DRKS:
- 2017-12-01
- Last update in DRKS:
- 2024-01-02
- Registration type:
- Prospective
Acronym/abbreviation of the study
Ultrafast Brain MRI in Acute Neurological Emergencies: the FAMILIES trial (LMU-RAD00055)
URL of the study
No Entry
Brief summary in lay language
This study begins with the selection of suitable patients in accordance to our specified inclusion and exclusion criteria which are based upon consultations with our colleagues in the interdisciplinary emergency department (neurology and neurosurgery). The patient’s cranial computed tomography (CT) images, taken as part of the standard emergency routine, will be evaluated a second time. Sufficient explanation of the patient’s symptoms by CT and study compatibility will be discussed with the treating physician. In the case of an insufficient CT result, the patient will be informed about the study, the use of encoded (pseudonymised) data and the examination using magnet resonance imaging (MRI). The patient’s participation is limited to the MRI examinations, which will include both an accelerated (GOBrain, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and a standard protocol. The standard and accelerated protocols will be performed in random order. Following the examination, a specialist will assess the results and record them in the radiological information system (RIS) for the treating physicians. All pathologies/observations will be documented. The CT and accelerated MRI protocol will be compared to the standard MRI protocol (reference standard). The investigation will compile data comparing the sensitivity and specificity, as well as rating the examination quality (1 - nondiagnostic, 2 - poor image quality and substantial artifacts, 3 - satisfactory, 4 - good image quality and minor artifacts, 5 - excellent image quality without artifacts) and gray-white matter differentiation (0 – no visible gray-white matter differentiation, 1 - unclear but recognizable borders, 2 - clear differentiation).
Brief summary in scientific language
Acute pathologies of the central nervous system are one of the most common reasons for an admission to an emergency department. Besides past medical history and the physical examination, prompt imaging procedures of the head are important to detect possible intracranial pathologies. The computed tomography (CT) of the head is an essential part of neurological emergency diagnostics. CT offers time efficient examinations and is widely spread in hospitals around the world. It is well suited to display high contrast structures (e.g. bones, air). However, alterations in low contrast structures (e.g. central nervous system) can often only be observed when they are very distinct. Alterations include hemorrhage, ischemia, edema, infarction and increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Therefore, CT is suboptimal for detailed diagnostics and differential diagnosis. The head MRI has distinct advantages during neurological emergency diagnostics, because of its higher soft tissue contrast and therefore superior diagnostic accuracy. However, the use of the head MRI for neurological emergency situations is limited because the examination procedure requires too much time (> 20 min for a standard head MRI protocol). To be able to make fast and precise therapy decisions, it is very important to have a fast, high resolution head imaging program. This study will evaluate a new head MRI protocol (GOBrain, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) which will reduce the standard head MRI examination time from 20 min to 5 min. The reduced acquisition time with this protocol may enable the use of the head MRI for acute emergency diagnostics. The prerequisite is that the accelerated MRI protocol will have to demonstrate an equivalent or better diagnostic value compared to standard MRI protocols. The goal of this study is to demonstrate the practicability and diagnostic value of the accelerated head MRI protocol in comparison to standard head MRI protocols, as well as CT head protocols.
Health condition or problem studied
- ICD10:
- I67.88
- ICD10:
- I63.0 - Cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of precerebral arteries
- ICD10:
- R58 - Haemorrhage, not elsewhere classified
- Healthy volunteers:
- No Entry
Interventions, Observational Groups
- Arm 1:
- This study begins with the selection of suitable patients in accordance to our specified inclusion and exclusion criteria which are based upon consultations with our colleagues in the interdisciplinary emergency department (neurology and neurosurgery). The patient’s cranial computed tomography (CT) images, taken as part of the standard emergency routine, will be evaluated a second time. Sufficient explanation of the patient’s symptoms by CT and study compatibility will be discussed with the treating physician. In the case of an insufficient CT result, the patient will be informed about the study, the use of encoded (pseudonymised) data and the examination using magnet resonance imaging (MRI). The patient’s participation is limited to the MRI examinations, which will include both an accelerated (GOBrain, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and a standard protocol. The standard and accelerated protocols will be performed in random order. Following the examination, a specialist will assess the results and record them in the radiological information system (RIS) for the treating physicians. All pathologies/observations will be documented. The CT and accelerated MRI protocol will be compared to the standard MRI protocol (reference standard). The investigation will compile data comparing the sensitivity and specificity, as well as rating the examination quality (1 - nondiagnostic, 2 - poor image quality and substantial artifacts, 3 - satisfactory, 4 - good image quality and minor artifacts, 5 - excellent image quality without artifacts) and gray-white matter differentiation (0 – no visible gray-white matter differentiation, 1 - unclear but recognizable borders, 2 - clear differentiation).
Endpoints
- Primary outcome:
- The primary outcome of this study will be accomplished after the examination results have been assessed by a specialist and the sensitivities and specificities of the CT examination, accelerated MRI protocol and standard MRI protocol have been determined. The sensitivities and specificities of the CT examination, accelerated MRI protocol and standard MRI protocol (reference standard) will be compared and evaluated. We assume that the results of the standard and accelerated protocols will be virtually identical and the accelerated protocol will prove to be superior to CT.
- Secondary outcome:
- Two blinded, independent readers will analyze all pseudonymised records. All pathologies/observations detected in the accelerated and standard MRI protocols will be recorded. Additionally, examination quality of the accelerated and standard MRI protocols will be assessed analogous to Prakkamukal et al. (J Neuroimaging 2016;26:503-510) (1 - nondiagnostic, 2 - poor image quality and substantial artifacts, 3 - satisfactory, 4 - good image quality and minor artifacts, 5 - excellent image quality without artifacts). Gray-white matter differentiation will also be assessed analogous to Prakkamukal et al. (0 – no visible gray-white matter differentiation, 1 - unclear but recognizable borders, 2 - clear differentiation).
Study Design
- Purpose:
- Diagnostic
- Allocation:
- N/A (single arm study)
- Control:
-
- Uncontrolled/single arm
- Phase:
- N/A
- Study type:
- Interventional
- Mechanism of allocation concealment:
- No Entry
- Blinding:
- No
- Assignment:
- Single (group)
- Sequence generation:
- No Entry
- Who is blinded:
- No Entry
Recruitment
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study complete
- Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
- No Entry
Recruitment Locations
- Recruitment countries:
-
- Germany
- Number of study centers:
- Monocenter study
- Recruitment location(s):
-
- University medical center Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie München
Recruitment period and number of participants
- Planned study start date:
- 2017-12-01
- Actual study start date:
- 2017-12-05
- Planned study completion date:
- No Entry
- Actual Study Completion Date:
- 2019-01-30
- Target Sample Size:
- 150
- Final Sample Size:
- 150
Inclusion Criteria
- Sex:
- All
- Minimum Age:
- 18 Years
- Maximum Age:
- no maximum age
- Additional Inclusion Criteria:
- - patients of the emergency department of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich-Großhadern (minimum age 18 years) - suspected intracranial pathologies (hemorrhage, ischemia, tumor, signs of inflammation, edema, increased intracranial pressure (ICP)) - insufficient explanation of symptoms after examination using the cranial computed tomography
Exclusion Criteria
- patients with MRI-incompatible intracorporeal material (e.g. pacemaker, bladder pacemaker, nerve stimulators) - lacking capability of giving consent - minors - claustrophobia - unstable general condition - pregnancy - sufficient explanation of symptoms by the cranial computed tomography
Addresses
Primary Sponsor
- Address:
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus GroßhadernMarchioninistraße 1581377 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- No Entry
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de
- Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
- Yes
Contact for Scientific Queries
- Address:
- Klinikum der Universität MünchenProf. Clemens CyranMarchioninistr. 1581377 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- +49 89 4400-73620
- Fax:
- (089) 4400-76648
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/de/index.html
Contact for Public Queries
- Address:
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie Klinikum der Universität München Campus GroßhadernChristel BesselerMarchioninistr. 1581377 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- (089) 4400-73652
- Fax:
- (089) 4400-76648
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://intranet.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/de/index.html
Principal Investigator
- Address:
- Klinikum der Universität MünchenProf. Clemens CyranMarchioninistr. 1581377 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- +49 89 4400-73620
- Fax:
- (089) 4400-76648
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/de/index.html
Sources of Monetary or Material Support
Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)
- Address:
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie Klinikum der Universität München Campus GroßhadernMarchioninistr. 1581377 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- (089) 4400-4400 72750
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Ethics Committee
Address Ethics Committee
- Address:
- Ethikkommission der Med. Fakultät der LMUPettenkoferstraße 880336 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- +49-89-440055191
- Fax:
- +49-89-440055192
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Date of ethics committee application:
- 2017-06-12
- Ethics committee number:
- 17-435
- Vote of the Ethics Committee:
- Approved
- Date of the vote:
- 2017-09-08
Further identification numbers
- Other primary registry ID:
- No Entry
- EudraCT Number:
- No Entry
- Other secondary IDs:
- interne Studiennummer - LMU-RAD00055
IPD - Individual Participant Data
- Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
- No
- IPD Sharing Plan:
- No Entry
Study protocol and other study documents
- Study protocols:
- No Entry
- Study abstract:
- Kazmierczak PM, Dührsen M, Forbrig R, Patzig M, Klein M, Pomschar A, Kunz WG, Puhr-Westerheide D, Ricke J, Solyanik O, Cyran CC. Ultrafast Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Neurological Emergencies: Diagnostic Accuracy and Impact on Patient Management. Invest Radiol. 2020 Mar;55(3):181-189. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000625. PMID: 31917761.
- Other study documents:
- Invest Radiol . 2020 Mar;55(3):181-189. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000625
- Background literature:
- No Entry
- Related DRKS studies:
- No Entry
Publication of study results
- Planned publication:
- No Entry
- Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
- Kazmierczak PM, Dührsen M, Forbrig R, Patzig M, Klein M, Pomschar A, Kunz WG, Puhr-Westerheide D, Ricke J, Solyanik O, Cyran CC. Ultrafast Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Neurological Emergencies: Diagnostic Accuracy and Impact on Patient Management. Invest Radiol. 2020 Mar;55(3):181-189. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000625. PMID: 31917761.
- Date of first publication of study results:
- 2020-03-01
- DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
- 2024-01-02
Basic reporting
- Basic Reporting / Results tables:
- No Entry
- Brief summary of results:
- Results: Ninety-three additional intracranial lesions (acute ischemia, n = 21; intracranial hemorrhage/microbleeds, n = 27; edema, n = 2; white matter lesion, n = 38; chronic infarction, n = 3; others, n = 2) were detected by ultrafast-MRI, whereas 101 additional intracranial lesions were detected by the standard-length protocol (acute ischemia, n = 24; intracranial hemorrhage/microbleeds, n = 32; edema, n = 2; white matter lesion, n = 38; chronic infarction, n = 3; others, n = 2). Image quality was equivalent to the standard-length protocol. Ultrafast-MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 0.939 [0.881-0.972]; specificity, 1.000 [0.895-1.000]) for the detection of intracranial pathologies. MRI led to a change in patient management in 10% compared with the initial CT. Conclusions: Ultrafast-MRI enables time-optimized diagnostic workup in acute neurological emergencies at high sensitivity and specificity compared with a standard-length protocol, with direct impact on patient management. Ultrafast MRI protocols are a powerful tool in the emergency setting and may be implemented on various scanner types based on the optimization of individual acquisition parameters.