Hemodynamic and Clinical Monitoring Program During and After the MitraClip® Procedure in Patients with Secondary MR and Advanced Systolic Heart Failure

Organizational Data

DRKS-ID:
DRKS00011138
Recruitment Status:
Recruiting complete, study continuing
Date of registration in DRKS:
2016-11-30
Last update in DRKS:
2019-04-15
Registration type:
Retrospective

Acronym/abbreviation of the study

Mitraclip Conductance

URL of the study

No Entry

Brief summary in lay language

The interventional therapy of MitraClip for the functional Mitral valve insufficiency (mitral valve insufficiency with impaired heart function) is an accepted method for patients with high surgery risk. There are only few data for patients with severe impairment of the left ventricular function (LVEF <25%). For this patients the peri- and postinterventional risk is higher than for patients with normal or slightly reduced LVEF and the longterme success for MI-reduction seem to be lower. Only few patients show a remodeling of the left ventricel due to reduction of the MI and left volume. That means that only for few patients there is a reduction of left diameters and show a higher ejection fraction (responder). The assumption is that non-responders have no recovery ability at the time of MitraClip-Therapy. For patients with severe reduced LVEF <25% and indication for MitraClip-Implantation we use a continous pressure-volume-analysis with conductance catheter during MitraClip-procedure for monitoring the heart function and hemodynamic. Additionaly, the pressure volume analysis quantifies the filling and pump properties of the impaired left ventricle. The objective of this study is a accurat systolic and diastolic functional analysis depending on the reduction of MI for patients with severe impaired heart function. We plan a correlation analysis with the clinical and morphlogical outcome post MitraClip-Procedure. This may help to find dependent and independent predictors for MitraClip-Theapy for responders and non-responders.

Brief summary in scientific language

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Nearly 25-30% of these patients develop a clinically relevant MR, which is associated with an adverse prognosis. Morbidity and mortality are directly related to MR severity (Rossi et al 2011). The goals of therapy in patients with secondary MR are to improve symptoms and quality of life, reduce heart failure hospitalizations, and potentially improve survival. The most recent European guidelines (2012) give a Class IIb C recommendation for MR repair for isolated severe secondary MR, but only for patients at low surgical risk with LVEF ≥ 30% (Vahanian et al 2012). Therefore, most HF patients with secondary MR do not undergo isolated MR surgery, especially in refractory severe systolic LV dysfunction. As a result, the lesser-invasive MitraClip® device has been developed to treat MR in surgically high risk patients. However, there are only two small studies examining Mitraclip® therapy in advanced systolic heart failure patients characterized by a EF ≤ 25% and a NYHA functional class ≥ III. These studies of Franzen (2011) and Auricchio (2011) suggest a similar procedural success as in patients with an ejection fraction higher than 25%, but the degree of LV remodeling was lower and the clinical non-responder rate (30-40% remains in NYHA III/IV) and hospital mortality were higher (5-6%). Our own clinical results have confirmed the higher clinical non-responder rate (40-50%) and perioperative mortality (4.4%) in advanced heart failure patients with an EF ≤ 25% and NYHA III/IV (n= 55). In 3 of these patients we observed a severe low output state and consecutive cardiogenic shock after successful MitraClip® procedure (MR ≤ 1). Therefore, especially in patients with advanced systolic heart failure, better predictors for a positive left ventricular performance and clinical response after significant MR reduction are needed. For the hemodynamic monitoring program during Mitraclip® procedure we used in our clinic the real time left atrial pressure (v wave) measurement in combination with continuous TEE. In cases of severe depressed left ventricular function (EF <25%, NYHA III/IV) we combined this procedure with an invasive real time left ventricular function analysis, made possible by continuous pressure–volume loop measurement (conductance catheter, CD Leycom). The objective is an exact Analysis of systolic and diastolic function in depending on reduction of mitral valve regurgitation. We plan to correlate these datas of the functional analysis with datas from clinical and morphological outcome post MitraClip Therapy. The goal is to improve the safety of the MitraClip® procedure via early recognition of signs of hemodynamic deterioration while performing the proceduren and to find Parameters for Response/Nonresponse after Mitraclip-Implantation.

Health condition or problem studied

ICD10:
I50 - Heart failure
ICD10:
I34 - Nonrheumatic mitral valve disorders
Healthy volunteers:
No Entry

Interventions, Observational Groups

Arm 1:
during mitraclip procedure in Patient with severe mitral valve insufficiency and severe left ventricular dysfunction (Ef <25%) we used routinely a multimodal hemodynamic Monitoring Programm, including a left atrial pressure catheter and a left ventricular pressure-volume catheter to increase the safety of this Intervention. In this one-arm observational study we want to correlate the pre- and peri-interventional hemodynamic data (lA a,v pressure, LV intrinsic contractility (Ees), intrinsic relaxation, dp/dt, total afterload Eea, ventricular-arterial coupling) with the data of the left ventricular remodeling and the degree of MR and the clinical outcome after 6 month FU. So, we want to find pre- and periinterventional hemodynamic Parameters to predict mitraclip responders vs. non-Responders.

Endpoints

Primary outcome:
This approach will help to find MR-dependent and independent predictors for the acute and chronic clinical and myocardial response (left ventricular remodelling) of Mitraclip® therapy in advanced systolic heart failure patients.
Secondary outcome:
/

Study Design

Purpose:
Basic research/physiological study
Retrospective/prospective:
No Entry
Study type:
Non-interventional
Longitudinal/cross-sectional:
No Entry
Study type non-interventional:
No Entry

Recruitment

Recruitment Status:
Recruiting complete, study continuing
Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
No Entry

Recruitment Locations

Recruitment countries:
  • Germany
Number of study centers:
Monocenter study
Recruitment location(s):
  • University medical center Klinik für Kardiologie Magdeburg

Recruitment period and number of participants

Planned study start date:
2016-12-01
Actual study start date:
2016-04-06
Planned study completion date:
No Entry
Actual Study Completion Date:
No Entry
Target Sample Size:
50
Final Sample Size:
77

Inclusion Criteria

Sex:
All
Minimum Age:
18 Years
Maximum Age:
no maximum age
Additional Inclusion Criteria:
-Age >18 years -Systolic heart failure, EF < 25%, NYHA III/IV -Severe functional mitral regurgitation according to ACC/AHA guidelines: ERO ≥ 20 mm2, regurgitant fraction ≥ 50%, regurgitant volume ≥ 30ml -Clinical indication for MitraClip® Implantation -Cardiac index ≤ 2.1 l/min/qm -Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

-Myocardial infarction within the last 3 months -Consuming tumor with an expected life expectancy < 12 months -Impossibility of MitraClip®-Implantation -Inability to follow instructions or comply with follow-up procedures, e.g. 6-minute-Walking Test -Pregnancy

Addresses

Primary Sponsor

Address:
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
Leipziger Str. 44
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
Telephone:
No Entry
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.med.uni-magdeburg.de
Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
Yes

Contact for Scientific Queries

Address:
Universitätsklinikum MagdeburgKlink für Kardiologie und Angiologie
Professor Alexander Schmeisser
Leipziger Straße 44
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
Telephone:
0391-6715190
Fax:
0391-67290154
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Contact for Public Queries

Address:
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Kardiologie
M.A. Kerstin Schäfer
Leipziger Straße 44
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
Telephone:
0391/6715190
Fax:
0391/67290154
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Principal Investigator

Address:
Universitätsklinikum MagdeburgKlink für Kardiologie und Angiologie
Professor Alexander Schmeisser
Leipziger Straße 44
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
Telephone:
0391-6715190
Fax:
0391-67290154
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Sources of Monetary or Material Support

Commercial (pharmaceutical industry, medical engineering industry, etc.)

Address:
Abbott Vascular
Schanzenstrasse 2
35578 Wetzlar
Germany
Telephone:
No Entry
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)

Address:
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
Leipziger Str. 44
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
Telephone:
No Entry
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.med.uni-magdeburg.de

Ethics Committee

Address Ethics Committee

Address:
Ethik-Kommission der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität an der Medizinischen Fakultät und am Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R.
Leipziger Str. 44 Haus 28
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49-391-6714314
Fax:
+49-391-67290185
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Vote of leading Ethics Committee

Vote of leading Ethics Committee
Date of ethics committee application:
2016-02-05
Ethics committee number:
21/16
Vote of the Ethics Committee:
Approved
Date of the vote:
2016-03-14

Further identification numbers

Other primary registry ID:
No Entry
EudraCT Number:
No Entry
UTN (Universal Trial Number):
No Entry
EUDAMED Number:
No Entry

IPD - Individual Participant Data

Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
No Entry
IPD Sharing Plan:
No Entry

Study protocol and other study documents

Study protocols:
No Entry
Study abstract:
No Entry
Other study documents:
Abschlussbericht
Background literature:
No Entry
Related DRKS studies:
No Entry

Publication of study results

Planned publication:
No Entry
Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
No Entry
Date of first publication of study results:
No Entry
DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
No Entry

Basic reporting

Basic Reporting / Results tables:
No Entry
Brief summary of results:
No Entry