Hemodynamic and Clinical Monitoring Program During and After the MitraClip® Procedure in Patients with Secondary MR and Advanced Systolic Heart Failure
Organizational Data
- DRKS-ID:
- DRKS00011138
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study continuing
- Date of registration in DRKS:
- 2016-11-30
- Last update in DRKS:
- 2019-04-15
- Registration type:
- Retrospective
Acronym/abbreviation of the study
Mitraclip Conductance
URL of the study
No Entry
Brief summary in lay language
The interventional therapy of MitraClip for the functional Mitral valve insufficiency (mitral valve insufficiency with impaired heart function) is an accepted method for patients with high surgery risk. There are only few data for patients with severe impairment of the left ventricular function (LVEF <25%). For this patients the peri- and postinterventional risk is higher than for patients with normal or slightly reduced LVEF and the longterme success for MI-reduction seem to be lower. Only few patients show a remodeling of the left ventricel due to reduction of the MI and left volume. That means that only for few patients there is a reduction of left diameters and show a higher ejection fraction (responder). The assumption is that non-responders have no recovery ability at the time of MitraClip-Therapy. For patients with severe reduced LVEF <25% and indication for MitraClip-Implantation we use a continous pressure-volume-analysis with conductance catheter during MitraClip-procedure for monitoring the heart function and hemodynamic. Additionaly, the pressure volume analysis quantifies the filling and pump properties of the impaired left ventricle. The objective of this study is a accurat systolic and diastolic functional analysis depending on the reduction of MI for patients with severe impaired heart function. We plan a correlation analysis with the clinical and morphlogical outcome post MitraClip-Procedure. This may help to find dependent and independent predictors for MitraClip-Theapy for responders and non-responders.
Brief summary in scientific language
Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Nearly 25-30% of these patients develop a clinically relevant MR, which is associated with an adverse prognosis. Morbidity and mortality are directly related to MR severity (Rossi et al 2011). The goals of therapy in patients with secondary MR are to improve symptoms and quality of life, reduce heart failure hospitalizations, and potentially improve survival. The most recent European guidelines (2012) give a Class IIb C recommendation for MR repair for isolated severe secondary MR, but only for patients at low surgical risk with LVEF ≥ 30% (Vahanian et al 2012). Therefore, most HF patients with secondary MR do not undergo isolated MR surgery, especially in refractory severe systolic LV dysfunction. As a result, the lesser-invasive MitraClip® device has been developed to treat MR in surgically high risk patients. However, there are only two small studies examining Mitraclip® therapy in advanced systolic heart failure patients characterized by a EF ≤ 25% and a NYHA functional class ≥ III. These studies of Franzen (2011) and Auricchio (2011) suggest a similar procedural success as in patients with an ejection fraction higher than 25%, but the degree of LV remodeling was lower and the clinical non-responder rate (30-40% remains in NYHA III/IV) and hospital mortality were higher (5-6%). Our own clinical results have confirmed the higher clinical non-responder rate (40-50%) and perioperative mortality (4.4%) in advanced heart failure patients with an EF ≤ 25% and NYHA III/IV (n= 55). In 3 of these patients we observed a severe low output state and consecutive cardiogenic shock after successful MitraClip® procedure (MR ≤ 1). Therefore, especially in patients with advanced systolic heart failure, better predictors for a positive left ventricular performance and clinical response after significant MR reduction are needed. For the hemodynamic monitoring program during Mitraclip® procedure we used in our clinic the real time left atrial pressure (v wave) measurement in combination with continuous TEE. In cases of severe depressed left ventricular function (EF <25%, NYHA III/IV) we combined this procedure with an invasive real time left ventricular function analysis, made possible by continuous pressure–volume loop measurement (conductance catheter, CD Leycom). The objective is an exact Analysis of systolic and diastolic function in depending on reduction of mitral valve regurgitation. We plan to correlate these datas of the functional analysis with datas from clinical and morphological outcome post MitraClip Therapy. The goal is to improve the safety of the MitraClip® procedure via early recognition of signs of hemodynamic deterioration while performing the proceduren and to find Parameters for Response/Nonresponse after Mitraclip-Implantation.
Health condition or problem studied
- ICD10:
- I50 - Heart failure
- ICD10:
- I34 - Nonrheumatic mitral valve disorders
- Healthy volunteers:
- No Entry
Interventions, Observational Groups
- Arm 1:
- during mitraclip procedure in Patient with severe mitral valve insufficiency and severe left ventricular dysfunction (Ef <25%) we used routinely a multimodal hemodynamic Monitoring Programm, including a left atrial pressure catheter and a left ventricular pressure-volume catheter to increase the safety of this Intervention. In this one-arm observational study we want to correlate the pre- and peri-interventional hemodynamic data (lA a,v pressure, LV intrinsic contractility (Ees), intrinsic relaxation, dp/dt, total afterload Eea, ventricular-arterial coupling) with the data of the left ventricular remodeling and the degree of MR and the clinical outcome after 6 month FU. So, we want to find pre- and periinterventional hemodynamic Parameters to predict mitraclip responders vs. non-Responders.
Endpoints
- Primary outcome:
- This approach will help to find MR-dependent and independent predictors for the acute and chronic clinical and myocardial response (left ventricular remodelling) of Mitraclip® therapy in advanced systolic heart failure patients.
- Secondary outcome:
- /
Study Design
- Purpose:
- Basic research/physiological study
- Retrospective/prospective:
- No Entry
- Study type:
- Non-interventional
- Longitudinal/cross-sectional:
- No Entry
- Study type non-interventional:
- No Entry
Recruitment
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study continuing
- Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
- No Entry
Recruitment Locations
- Recruitment countries:
-
- Germany
- Number of study centers:
- Monocenter study
- Recruitment location(s):
-
- University medical center Klinik für Kardiologie Magdeburg
Recruitment period and number of participants
- Planned study start date:
- 2016-12-01
- Actual study start date:
- 2016-04-06
- Planned study completion date:
- No Entry
- Actual Study Completion Date:
- No Entry
- Target Sample Size:
- 50
- Final Sample Size:
- 77
Inclusion Criteria
- Sex:
- All
- Minimum Age:
- 18 Years
- Maximum Age:
- no maximum age
- Additional Inclusion Criteria:
- -Age >18 years -Systolic heart failure, EF < 25%, NYHA III/IV -Severe functional mitral regurgitation according to ACC/AHA guidelines: ERO ≥ 20 mm2, regurgitant fraction ≥ 50%, regurgitant volume ≥ 30ml -Clinical indication for MitraClip® Implantation -Cardiac index ≤ 2.1 l/min/qm -Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
-Myocardial infarction within the last 3 months -Consuming tumor with an expected life expectancy < 12 months -Impossibility of MitraClip®-Implantation -Inability to follow instructions or comply with follow-up procedures, e.g. 6-minute-Walking Test -Pregnancy
Addresses
Primary Sponsor
- Address:
- Universitätsklinikum MagdeburgLeipziger Str. 4439120 MagdeburgGermany
- Telephone:
- No Entry
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.med.uni-magdeburg.de
- Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
- Yes
Contact for Scientific Queries
- Address:
- Universitätsklinikum MagdeburgKlink für Kardiologie und AngiologieProfessor Alexander SchmeisserLeipziger Straße 4439120 MagdeburgGermany
- Telephone:
- 0391-6715190
- Fax:
- 0391-67290154
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Contact for Public Queries
- Address:
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für KardiologieM.A. Kerstin SchäferLeipziger Straße 4439120 MagdeburgGermany
- Telephone:
- 0391/6715190
- Fax:
- 0391/67290154
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Principal Investigator
- Address:
- Universitätsklinikum MagdeburgKlink für Kardiologie und AngiologieProfessor Alexander SchmeisserLeipziger Straße 4439120 MagdeburgGermany
- Telephone:
- 0391-6715190
- Fax:
- 0391-67290154
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Sources of Monetary or Material Support
Commercial (pharmaceutical industry, medical engineering industry, etc.)
- Address:
- Abbott VascularSchanzenstrasse 235578 WetzlarGermany
- Telephone:
- No Entry
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)
- Address:
- Universitätsklinikum MagdeburgLeipziger Str. 4439120 MagdeburgGermany
- Telephone:
- No Entry
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.med.uni-magdeburg.de
Ethics Committee
Address Ethics Committee
- Address:
- Ethik-Kommission der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität an der Medizinischen Fakultät und am Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R.Leipziger Str. 44 Haus 2839120 MagdeburgGermany
- Telephone:
- +49-391-6714314
- Fax:
- +49-391-67290185
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Date of ethics committee application:
- 2016-02-05
- Ethics committee number:
- 21/16
- Vote of the Ethics Committee:
- Approved
- Date of the vote:
- 2016-03-14
Further identification numbers
- Other primary registry ID:
- No Entry
- EudraCT Number:
- No Entry
IPD - Individual Participant Data
- Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
- No Entry
- IPD Sharing Plan:
- No Entry
Study protocol and other study documents
- Study protocols:
- No Entry
- Study abstract:
- No Entry
- Other study documents:
- Abschlussbericht
- Background literature:
- No Entry
- Related DRKS studies:
- No Entry
Publication of study results
- Planned publication:
- No Entry
- Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
- No Entry
- Date of first publication of study results:
- No Entry
- DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
- No Entry
Basic reporting
- Basic Reporting / Results tables:
- No Entry
- Brief summary of results:
- No Entry