Agility Training for the Elderly – a one-year randomized controlled intervention
Organizational Data
- DRKS-ID:
- DRKS00017469
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study continuing
- Date of registration in DRKS:
- 2019-06-19
- Last update in DRKS:
- 2019-06-19
- Registration type:
- Retrospective
Acronym/abbreviation of the study
AgilE
URL of the study
No Entry
Brief summary in lay language
Aging is a natural and complex process that implicates for example biological degeneration or changes in the social position of a person and his/her social participation. High age (>60) is closely related to a general reduction of physical performance. Quite often, this leads to a loss of independence of seniors. Although many studies shows that physical activity of seniors is an effective means to counteract aging-related changes, there are still mayor research gaps. Only few longtime studies (>6 months) exist which examine multifaceted changes of healthy seniors after a training intervention. Furthermore, it is striking that multimodal training modes, combining strength-, endurance- and balance training, are solemnly conducted. This exact integral training design is important to counteract the variety of aging-related changes. Current training recommendations (e.g. WHO) view all training (e.g. strength, endurance, balance) modes separately. This leads to unrealistic training volumes for seniors who do not just want to address one training mode. Thus, the aim of the longtime study is to integrally examine the effects of a multimodal, agility-based training. Therefore, 85 retired, independently living men and women older than 60 years are recruited. The participants are enrolled to either the training or the intervention group. The training group trains twice weekly for one year. Training is supervised and conducted in small groups. The control group receives current training recommendations (WHO, 2019) once at the beginning of the one year period and no further treatment. Before and after the one-year training period, a variety of health and performance related parameters are assessed in the training- as well as in the control group. It is expected that the multimodal training of the training group, a opposed to the control group, will induce multiple health and performance related improvements.
Brief summary in scientific language
Aging is a natural and complex process that implicates for example biological degeneration or changes in the social position of a person and his/her social participation. High age (>60) is closely related to a general reduction of physical performance. Frailty is related to reduced strength and/or power, lower cardiovascular function and with the degeneration of neural structures. Quite often, this leads to a loss of independence of seniors. Although many studies show that physical activity is an effective means to counteract aging-related changes, there are still mayor research gaps. Only few longtime studies (>6 months) exist which examine neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cognitive and psychosocial changes of healthy seniors as a response to training. Furthermore, it is striking that multimodal training modes, combining strength-, endurance- and balance training, are solemnly conducted. This exact integral training design is important to counteract the variety of aging-related changes. Current training recommendations (e.g. WHO) view all training (e.g. strength, endurance, balance) modes separately. This leads to unrealistic training volumes for seniors who do not just want to address one training mode. Thus, the aim of the longtime study is to integrally examine the effects of a multimodal, agility-based training. Therefore, a one-year randomized controlled intervention study is conducted. The effectiveness of an agility-based training approach is examined in a two-armed study design. 85 retired, independently living men and women older than 60 years are recruited and are allocated to either the training or the control group. The training group trains twice weekly for one year. Training is supervised and conducted in small groups. The control group receives current training recommendations (WHO, 2019) once at the beginning of the one-year period and no further treatment. Before and after the one-year training period, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cognitive and psychosocial parameters are assessed in both groups. Improvements with moderate effect size are expected in the training group in all outcome measures. For the control group, no improvements are expected.
Health condition or problem studied
- Free text:
- Participants are healthy, active seniors, who are facing a higher fall risk due to their age, when compared to younger people
- Healthy volunteers:
- No Entry
Interventions, Observational Groups
- Arm 1:
- multimodal agility-based training intervention (2x/week 1 hour superviesd training in small groups
- Arm 2:
- control group (once: general training reccommendations for seniors (WHO, 2019) without further intervention)
Endpoints
- Primary outcome:
- Primary Outcomes are assessed before the intervention period, after 6 months and after the one year intervention: Isometric maximal strength of the leg extensors, leg flexors and the hand are measured with machines with force transducers. Static balance is assessed on a force plate in one-leggend stance and tandem stance. Dynamic balance is assessed on a posturomed with a position sensor after an extermal perturbation. Gait speed is measured in single-, dual-, and triple-task conditions with photoelectrical sensors. Psychosocial parameters are assessed with multiple questionnaires: "Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale", "Perceived Stress Scale", "Insomnia Severity Index", "World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire". VO2max is measured via a spiroegometry during a step test on a bicyle ergometer. Measurements of VO2max are not conducted at interim measurements after 6 months.
- Secondary outcome:
- All secondary outcomes are assessed before and after the intervention period: Jump height of the Counter Movement Jump is measured on a force plate. The "Agility Challence for the Elderly" (ACE) is conducted in a gym and time is measured with photoelectrical sensors. A muslce sonography of different leg muscles is done to assess muscle cross sectional area and pennation angle. Central cartoid pulse wave velocity is measured at rest, as well as retinal vessel diameter and echocardiography. During the spiroergometric measurements, an exercise ECG is conducted. Blood samples are taken to analyze several health markers. A 24-houres blood pressure and a 24-houres-ECG measurement are done. To assess cognitive abilities, the "N-back test" and the "Eriksen-Flanker task" are done.
Study Design
- Purpose:
- Prevention
- Allocation:
- Randomized controlled study
- Control:
-
- Control group receives no treatment
- Phase:
- N/A
- Study type:
- Interventional
- Mechanism of allocation concealment:
- No Entry
- Blinding:
- No
- Assignment:
- Parallel
- Sequence generation:
- No Entry
- Who is blinded:
- No Entry
Recruitment
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study continuing
- Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
- No Entry
Recruitment Locations
- Recruitment countries:
-
- Germany
- Number of study centers:
- Monocenter study
- Recruitment location(s):
-
- Other Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln Köln
Recruitment period and number of participants
- Planned study start date:
- No Entry
- Actual study start date:
- 2019-01-07
- Planned study completion date:
- No Entry
- Actual Study Completion Date:
- No Entry
- Target Sample Size:
- 85
- Final Sample Size:
- 85
Inclusion Criteria
- Sex:
- All
- Minimum Age:
- 60 Years
- Maximum Age:
- no maximum age
- Additional Inclusion Criteria:
- retired; ready to be randomized; able to travel to training site twice a week; independently living
Exclusion Criteria
severe cardiovascular disease (e.g. CHD, cardiac insufficiency); chronic inflammatory disease; pulmonary disease; depression, insulin-dependent diabetes; history of cancer (except completed therapy, symptom free and free of complaints); severe orthopaedic complaints; more than light, age-related osteoporotic changes; BMI>35; severe bone injury in the past 6 months; current strong smoker (>15 pack years); expected time of travel >2 months in the intervention period; more than twice a week structured cardiovascular/neuromuscular training in the past 3 months
Addresses
Primary Sponsor
- Address:
- Deutsche Sporthochschule KölnAm Sportpark Müngersdorf 650933 KölnGermany
- Telephone:
- No Entry
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
- Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
- Yes
Contact for Scientific Queries
- Address:
- Deutsche Sporthochschule KölnUniv. Prof. Dr. Lars DonathAm Sportpark Müngersdorf 650933 KölnGermany
- Telephone:
- 022149827701
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Contact for Public Queries
- Address:
- Deutsche Sporthochschule KölnMareike MoratAm Sportpark Müngersdorf 650933 KölnGermany
- Telephone:
- 022149827620
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Principal Investigator
- Address:
- Deutsche Sporthochschule KölnUniv. Prof. Dr. Lars DonathAm Sportpark Müngersdorf 650933 KölnGermany
- Telephone:
- 022149827701
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Sources of Monetary or Material Support
Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)
- Address:
- Deutsche Sporthochschule KölnAm Sportpark Müngersdorf 650933 KölnGermany
- Telephone:
- 022149827701
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Ethics Committee
Address Ethics Committee
- Address:
- Ethikkommission der Deutschen Sporthochschule KölnAm Sportpark Müngersdorf 650933 KölnGermany
- Telephone:
- (+49)221-49823810
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Date of ethics committee application:
- 2018-10-31
- Ethics committee number:
- 131/2018
- Vote of the Ethics Committee:
- Approved
- Date of the vote:
- 2018-11-13
Further identification numbers
- Other primary registry ID:
- No Entry
- EudraCT Number:
- No Entry
IPD - Individual Participant Data
- Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
- No Entry
- IPD Sharing Plan:
- No Entry
Study protocol and other study documents
- Study protocols:
- No Entry
- Study abstract:
- No Entry
- Other study documents:
- No Entry
- Background literature:
- No Entry
- Related DRKS studies:
- No Entry
Publication of study results
- Planned publication:
- No Entry
- Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
- No Entry
- Date of first publication of study results:
- No Entry
- DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
- No Entry
Basic reporting
- Basic Reporting / Results tables:
- No Entry
- Brief summary of results:
- No Entry