Comparison of titanium Herbert screw osteosynthesis of SCAphoid fractures with osteosynthesis by the bioabsorbable compression screw MAGNEZIX® CS: The randomized controlled multicentre trial SCAMAG

Organizational Data

DRKS-ID:
DRKS00013368
Recruitment Status:
Recruiting ongoing
Date of registration in DRKS:
2017-12-04
Last update in DRKS:
2022-02-08
Registration type:
Prospective

Acronym/abbreviation of the study

SCAMAG

URL of the study

No Entry

Brief summary in lay language

The scaphoid bone is the second largest of the eight carpal bones. It is located in the second row closest to the thumb. Scaphoid fractures account for approximately 5% of all carpal fractures. Primarily males are affected with an age between 20 and 29 years. Scaphoid fractures often need to be treated by surgery, where a screw is inserted into the bone for fixation and subsequent healing. Commonly, titanium screws are used for fixation, which remain in the body or are removed after healing. An alternative is MAGNEZIX CS, a magnesium-based screw which degradates over time in hte body. Aim of this tria is to show that MAGNEZIX CS screws are not inferior to titanium screws with respect to mobility of the hand and possible complications during healing. Concurrently, the aim is to show in a smaller group of patients undergoing MRI that MAGNEZIX CS screws are superior to titanium screws because of their degradation property. This is to be demonstrated by fewer disturbances, i.e., artifacts in the MRIs.

Brief summary in scientific language

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures. Surgeons may choose between different implant materials, including conventional metal implants, such as titanium, or absorbable implants, such as magnesium-based material. Magnesium-based implants have beneficial material properties, such as higher stability than polymer implants, osteoconductivity, inhibition of infections and almost no artifacts in MRI scans. The aim of this trial is demonstrate non-inferiority of MAGNEZIX CS screws compared to classical titanium Herbert screws for scaphoid fractures of types A2, B1, B2 and B3. The trial is a multicentre, blinded observer, randomized controlled parallel group post market trial with two groups. Approximately 190 patients with scaphoid fractures will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by centre either to MAGNEZIX CS or titanium screws. Each patient will be followed up for 1 year. Inclusion criteria include normal wrist function prior to fraction, no previous surgery of the wrist, no complex regional pain syndrome, no simultaneous fractures on both arms and no ligamentary concomitant injuries. Surgical procedures and aftercare will be performed according to the S3 AWMF guideline for scaphoid fractures. There are three primary endpoints: 1. patient related wrist evaluation (PRWE) total score 6 months after randomization, 2. safety event, i.e., evidence of bone union until 6 months, no adverse device effect during surgery, no adverse device effect during wound healing, no reoperation within 1 year, no serious adverse device effect within 1 year, and 3. artifacts in magnet resonance imaging (MRI) as measured by difference between maximum length of an artifact between 1-year follow-up and baseline. Non-inferiority of MAGNEZIX CS compared to titanium screws will be investigated for primary endpoints 1 and 2 using the full analysis set based on the intention to treat population (FAS) and the per protocol population at the one-sided 2.5% test level. Superiority of MAGNEZIX CS over titanium screws will be established using the FAS population at the two-sided 5% test level only if non-inferiority has been established for primary endpoints 1 and 2. The t-test-based confidence interval based will be used for analyzing endpoint 1, Wilson's score interval for endpoint 2 and the Welch test for endpoint 3. The ethics commission's statement of the MHH for amendment 3 (age >= 16, recruitung time extended) is available since 09.10.2019 at the number 7614.

Health condition or problem studied

ICD10:
S62.0 - Fracture of navicular [scaphoid] bone of hand
Healthy volunteers:
No Entry

Interventions, Observational Groups

Arm 1:
MAGNEZIX CS Fracture type B3: MAGNEZIX screw 2.0 Fracture types A2, B1 and B2: choice of screw with diameter 2.7 or 3.2 by the surgeon intraoperatively
Arm 2:
Classical titanium Herbert screw with size selected by the surgeon

Endpoints

Primary outcome:
First primary endpoint: patient-related wrist evaluation (PRWE) total score after 6 months. Second primary endpoint: dichotomous and scored =1 if: - an adverse device effect occurred during surgery and/or - an adverse device effect occurred during the wound healing period and/or - a servere adverse device effect occurred during the 1-year follow-up period and/or - a reoperation was performed during the 1-year follow-up period and/or - there was no or incomplete bone union until 6 months after randomization. Third primary endpoint: difference between maximum length of an artifact in MRI between 1-year follow-up and baseline. Measured only in those patients participating in the MRT part of the trial.
Secondary outcome:
- PRWE total score at 3 and 12 months. - PRWE domains pain and function at months 3, 6 and 12. - Disabilities of the Arms, Shoulder and Hands questionnaire (DASH) total score at 3, 6 and 12 months. - DASH optional module scores sport/music at 3, 6 and 12 months. - DASH optional module scores work at 3, 6 and 12 months. - Krimmer Wrist Score (KWS) total score at months 3, 6 and 12. - Domains of the KWS at months 3, 6 and 12. - Wrist function using range of motion as measured with a goniometer at months 3, 6 and 12. - Grip strength as measured with a dynamometer at months 3, 6 and 12. - Bone union as measured by imaging (X-ray, CT -- according to guideline) at month 6. - Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at months 3, 6 and 12. - Return to work and recreational activities (time to event). - Edema in MRI at months 3, 6, 9 and 12.

Study Design

Purpose:
Treatment
Allocation:
Randomized controlled study
Control:
  • Active control (effective treatment of control group)
Phase:
IV
Study type:
Interventional
Mechanism of allocation concealment:
No Entry
Blinding:
Yes
Assignment:
Parallel
Sequence generation:
No Entry
Who is blinded:
  • Assessor

Recruitment

Recruitment Status:
Recruiting ongoing
Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
No Entry

Recruitment Locations

Recruitment countries:
  • Germany
Number of study centers:
Multicenter study
Recruitment location(s):
  • University medical center Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover
  • Medical center AKH Celle
  • Medical center Agaplesion Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wümme)
  • Medical center Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg
  • Medical center Klinik für Plastisch-rekonstruktive Ästhetische und Handchirurgie Kassel
  • Medical center Klinik für Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie Gelsenkirchen
  • University medical center Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum
  • Medical center HELIOS Plastische- , Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie Duisburg
  • University medical center UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie Dresden
  • University medical center Zentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Mainz

Recruitment period and number of participants

Planned study start date:
2018-01-02
Actual study start date:
2018-01-08
Planned study completion date:
No Entry
Actual Study Completion Date:
No Entry
Target Sample Size:
190
Final Sample Size:
No Entry

Inclusion Criteria

Sex:
All
Minimum Age:
16 Years
Maximum Age:
no maximum age
Additional Inclusion Criteria:
1. Indication for screw fixation of scaphoid fracture which is not older than 12 weeks; classification by Herbert, modified by Krimmer of types A2, B1, B2, B3 (Krimmer et al., 2000a), 2. normal wrist function prior to fracture, 3. age ≥16 years, 4. written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous surgery on the wrist, associated injuries, state after or suspicion of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), 2. simultaneous fractures of the forearm of both sides and those who will influence the postoperative care, 3. ligamentary concomitant injuries of the wrist on both sides and those who will influence the post-operative care, 4. radiological findings of losing calcium carbonate in bones, 5. pregnancy, suspected pregnancy or breastfeeding period, 6. allergies to components of osteosynthesis material, 7. participation in other clinical trials up to 30 days before inclusion in this trial, 8. neurological deficits, 9. for patients recruited to the Hanover center and undergoing MRI: claustrophobia and metallic implants which are contraindicative for an MRI.

Addresses

Primary Sponsor

Address:
Syntellix AG
Aegidientorplatz 2a
30159 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
+49 511 270 41370
Fax:
+49 511 270 41379
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://syntellix.com
Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
No

Contact for Scientific Queries

Address:
Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
PD Dr. Sören Könneker
Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1
30625 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
+49 511 532-8865
Fax:
+49 511 532-168864
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.mh-hannover.de

Contact for Public Queries

Address:
AMEDON GmbH
Dr. Katja Krockenberger
Willi-Brandt-Allee 31c
23544 Lübeck
Germany
Telephone:
+49 451 384500
Fax:
No Entry
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://amedon.de

Principal Investigator

Address:
Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
PD Dr. Sören Könneker
Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1
30625 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
+49 511 532-8865
Fax:
+49 511 532-168864
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.mh-hannover.de

Sources of Monetary or Material Support

Commercial (pharmaceutical industry, medical engineering industry, etc.)

Address:
Syntellix AG
Aegidientorplatz 2a
30159 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
+49 511 270 41370
Fax:
+49 511 270 41379
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://syntellix.com

Ethics Committee

Address Ethics Committee

Address:
Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1
30625 Hannover
Germany
Telephone:
+49-511-5323443
Fax:
+49-511-5325423
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Vote of leading Ethics Committee

Vote of leading Ethics Committee
Date of ethics committee application:
2017-08-29
Ethics committee number:
7614
Vote of the Ethics Committee:
Approved
Date of the vote:
2017-09-20

Further identification numbers

Other primary registry ID:
No Entry
EudraCT Number:
No Entry
UTN (Universal Trial Number):
No Entry
EUDAMED Number:
No Entry

IPD - Individual Participant Data

Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
No
IPD Sharing Plan:
No Entry

Study protocol and other study documents

Study protocols:
No Entry
Study abstract:
No Entry
Other study documents:
No Entry
Background literature:
No Entry
Related DRKS studies:
No Entry

Publication of study results

Planned publication:
No Entry
Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
Könneker et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2019) 20:357
Date of first publication of study results:
No Entry
DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
No Entry

Basic reporting

Basic Reporting / Results tables:
No Entry
Brief summary of results:
No Entry