A virtual reality environment using a head-mounted display for interactive and immersive 3D operation planning and training for complex liver cases: Is it better than traditional methods? – study protocol for a randomized controlled trail
Organizational Data
- DRKS-ID:
- DRKS00011000
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting ongoing
- Date of registration in DRKS:
- 2016-08-19
- Last update in DRKS:
- 2016-08-19
- Registration type:
- Prospective
Acronym/abbreviation of the study
No Entry
URL of the study
No Entry
Brief summary in lay language
The surgical removal of malignant liver lesions is in most cases the only curative treatment. Liver surgery aims to safely remove all affected tissue while minimizing the extent of the resection and loss of functional tissue. To achieve this complex operative interventions in the liver require accurate imaging and visualization of pathological lesions and the operating field. Sectional imaging (e.g. computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) is one of the most helpful tools, which aids the surgeon in preparing for the operation, carrying out measurements, visualizing the individual anatomy of the patient, assessing specific risks, taking surgical decisions and thinking through certain operational steps in advance. At the moment radiological imaging data is displayed in stacked sectional views on a standard monitor. The fusion of anatomy, anomalies and pathological changes is solely dependent on the capacity for remembering and the spatial imagination of the operating surgeon. Modern methods allow for a better, immersive and intuitive visualization of all relevant information (patient information, 3D-model of the organs and radiological imaging data) in a virtual reality environment. Particularly the three-dimensional visualization of imaging data is more intuitive. 3D-operation-planning in comparison to traditional 2D-methods proved beneficial in complex liver resection with big central tumors. So far these 3D-models are displayed on 2D-monitors. The present study will evaluate a system which can visualize the operating field of a patient in a three-dimensional, interactive, intuitive and immersive fashion with a head-mounted display (e.g. Oculus Rift™ (Oculus VR® LLC, Irvine, CA, USA). For this patient specific radiological imaging data (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) will be used to create a 3D-model and integrated into a virtual reality environment with a virtual-reality (VR) headset. The operating field can be visualized realistically. In this study we will evaluate to what extent medical students and surgeons, using this technology in comparison to traditional methods, can quickly and correctly identify patient individual anatomy and pathology and make a surgical decision. Participants are medical students or surgeons of the University of Heidelberg. These will use and evaluate three different operation planning methods for complex liver cases in three groups. Traditional operation planning with sectional views on the monitor will be compared to a 3D-visualization on a monitor and a 3D-visualization in a virtual reality environment with VR-headsets. The correctness and speed of surgical decisions with each of the visualization methods will be evaluated. Furthermore satisfaction, usefulness and potential of the visualization methods will be assessed.
Brief summary in scientific language
Liver resection is the best and in most cases definitive treatment for malignant hepatic lesions. Liver surgery aims to safely remove all affected tissue while minimizing the extent of the resection and loss of functional tissue. To achieve this complex operative interventions in the liver require accurate imaging and visualization of the pathology and the operating field. Sectional imaging (e.g. computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) is one of the most helpful tools, which aids the surgeon in preparing for the operation, carrying out measurements, visualizing the individual anatomy of the patient, assessing specific risks, taking surgical decisions and thinking through certain operational steps in advance. At the moment radiological imaging data is displayed in stacked sectional views on a standard monitor. Modern methods allow for a better immersive and intuitive visualization of all relevant information (patient information, 3D-model of the organs and radiological imaging data) in a virtual reality environment. Particularly the three-dimensional visualization of imaging data is more intuitive. For this CT-images are segmented and visualized as 3D-models. 3D operation planning in comparison to traditional 2D-methods proved beneficial in complex liver resection with big central tumors in aiding to localize the tumor and planning the resection plane. So far these 3D-models are displayed on 2D-monitors. The present study will evaluate a system which can visualize target structures and the operating field of a patient in a three-dimensional, interactive, intuitive and immersive fashion with a head-mounted display (e.g. Oculus Rift™ (Oculus VR® LLC, Irvine, CA, USA)). For this patient specific radiological imaging data (CT- or MRI-data) will be used to create a 3D-model and integrated into a virtual reality environment with a virtual-reality (VR) headset. The operating field can be visualized realistically. In this study we will evaluate to what extent medical students and surgeons, using this technology in comparison to traditional methods, can quickly and correctly identify patient individual anatomy and pathology and make a surgical decision. This is a prospective, monocentric, randomized controlled study. The participants are medical students and surgeon of the University of Heidelberg. Medical students must have completed the surgical educational module within the medical curriculum of Heidelberg. Participants are stratified according to level of education (students, surgeons) and randomized in one of three arms in a 1:1:1 ratio. Operation planning will be performed either with sectional views on a standard monitor (group “2D, control group), with 3D-models on a standard monitor (group “3D”) or within a virtual reality environment (group “VR). All participants will evaluate three consecutive liver cases with increasing difficulty. A score is determined from the correctness of the answers on an 11-item-checklist assessing liver anatomy and pathology, anomalies and the relation between pathology and anatomy, as well as whether the correct liver resection can be indicated. The time to answer this checklist will be measured. After all liver cases have been evaluated a 14-item-checklist will be filled out assessing satisfaction, usefulness and potential of the visualization methods. All participants receive a standardized recapitulation of liver and vessel anatomy, as well as surgical treatment Options before randomization. After the randomization participants had ample time to familiarize themselves with their visualization method.
Health condition or problem studied
- ICD10:
- C22.0 - Liver cell carcinoma
- ICD10:
- C22.1 - Intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma
- ICD10:
- C22.7 - Other specified carcinomas of liver
- Healthy volunteers:
- No Entry
Interventions, Observational Groups
- Arm 1:
- 3D-group: In the 3D-group participants evaluate the imaging data as a 3D-model on a standard monitor, anonymized patient information is available on a printed sheet.
- Arm 2:
- VR-group In the VR-group participants evaluate the imaging data in the virtual reality environment with a head-mounted display (e.g. Oculus Rift™ (Oculus VR® LLC, Irvine, CA, USA). Anonymized patient information is integrated into this environment.
- Arm 3:
- 2D-group (control Group): In the 2D-group participants evaluate the imaging data in sectional views on a standard monitor, anonymized patient information is available on a printed sheet.
Endpoints
- Primary outcome:
- The primary outcome measure is the difference in the score as measured by an 11-item-checklist with yes/no-, multiple-choice- and single-choice-questions. The checklist measures if relevant liver anatomy and pathology, anomalies and the relation between pathology and anatomy can be assessed and if the decision for a correct liver resection can be made.
- Secondary outcome:
- Secondary endpoints are the time it took to answer above mentioned checklist, as wel as satisfaction, usefulness and potential of this technology as assessed by an 14-item-checklist with Likert-scales, multiple-choice-questions and and free text. Further secondary endpoint include evaluation of score differences by gender and surgical education level (experienced vs. inexperienced surgeons).
Study Design
- Purpose:
- Other
- Allocation:
- Randomized controlled study
- Control:
-
- Active control (effective treatment of control group)
- Phase:
- N/A
- Study type:
- Interventional
- Mechanism of allocation concealment:
- No Entry
- Blinding:
- Yes
- Assignment:
- Parallel
- Sequence generation:
- No Entry
- Who is blinded:
-
- Data analyst
Recruitment
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting ongoing
- Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
- No Entry
Recruitment Locations
- Recruitment countries:
-
- Germany
- Number of study centers:
- Monocenter study
- Recruitment location(s):
-
- University medical center Chirurgisches Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Recruitment period and number of participants
- Planned study start date:
- 2016-08-31
- Actual study start date:
- No Entry
- Planned study completion date:
- No Entry
- Actual Study Completion Date:
- No Entry
- Target Sample Size:
- 150
- Final Sample Size:
- No Entry
Inclusion Criteria
- Sex:
- All
- Minimum Age:
- 18 Years
- Maximum Age:
- no maximum age
- Additional Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical students in clinical phase of university education, surgeons in general or visceral surgery
Exclusion Criteria
Medical students that have not completed the surgical education module of the medical curriculum of the University of Heidelberg
Addresses
Primary Sponsor
- Address:
- Chirurgisches Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergDr. med. Hannes KenngottIm Neuenheimer Feld 11069120 HeidelbergGermany
- Telephone:
- +496221568641
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.med.uni-heidelberg.de
- Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
- Yes
Contact for Scientific Queries
- Address:
- Chirurgisches Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergDr. med. Hannes Götz KenngottIm Neuenheimer Feld 11069120 HeidelbergGermany
- Telephone:
- +496221568641
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.med.uni-heidelberg.de
Contact for Public Queries
- Address:
- Chirurgisches Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergAnas PreukschasIm Neuenheimer Feld 11069120 HeidelbergGermany
- Telephone:
- +496221568641
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.med.uni-heidelberg.de
Principal Investigator
- Address:
- Chirurgisches Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergDr. med. Hannes Götz KenngottIm Neuenheimer Feld 11069120 HeidelbergGermany
- Telephone:
- +496221568641
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- http://www.med.uni-heidelberg.de
Sources of Monetary or Material Support
Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)
- Address:
- Chirurgisches Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergIm Neuenheimer Feld 11069120 HeidelbergGermany
- Telephone:
- 06221568641
- Fax:
- 06221568645
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/Chirurgische-Klinik.1010.0.html
Ethics Committee
Address Ethics Committee
- Address:
- Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät HeidelbergAlte Glockengießerei 11/169115 HeidelbergGermany
- Telephone:
- +49-6221-338220
- Fax:
- +49-6221-3382222
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Date of ethics committee application:
- 2016-06-15
- Ethics committee number:
- S-349/2016
- Vote of the Ethics Committee:
- Approved
- Date of the vote:
- 2016-07-18
Further identification numbers
- Other primary registry ID:
- No Entry
- EudraCT Number:
- No Entry
IPD - Individual Participant Data
- Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
- No Entry
- IPD Sharing Plan:
- No Entry
Study protocol and other study documents
- Study protocols:
- No Entry
- Study abstract:
- No Entry
- Other study documents:
- No Entry
- Background literature:
- No Entry
- Related DRKS studies:
- No Entry
Publication of study results
- Planned publication:
- No Entry
- Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
- No Entry
- Date of first publication of study results:
- No Entry
- DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
- No Entry
Basic reporting
- Basic Reporting / Results tables:
- No Entry
- Brief summary of results:
- No Entry