Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) using conventional fluoroscopy and 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation - a prospective, randomized comparative study regarding radiation exposure as well as radiological and clinical results.

Organizational Data

DRKS-ID:
DRKS00004514
Recruitment Status:
Recruiting complete, study complete
Date of registration in DRKS:
2012-11-08
Last update in DRKS:
2021-03-22
Registration type:
Prospective

Acronym/abbreviation of the study

No Entry

URL of the study

No Entry

Brief summary in lay language

In minimally invasive surgery for stabilizing the lumbar spine, implants (screws, rods, spacer) have to be introduced precisely. For this purpose, X-ray-based imaging techniques are used intraoperatively. Conventional X-ray imaging (fluoroscopy) and intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (creating a 3D data set by fluoroscopy for navigation) are established imaging techniques. Since X-rays are ionizing and have potentially damaging effect on tissue, the most economical use of X-rays is crucial. Radiation exposure to patient and operating room staff by these two imaging techniques during minimally invasive stabilization of the lumbar spine (MIS TLIF) has not yet been compared. The aim of this study is to compare "conventional fluoroscopy" and intraoperative "3D Fluoroscopic navigation" in terms of radiation exposure of the patient and the operating room staff as well as the clinical and radiological results in minimally invasive stabilization of the lumbar spine (MIS TLIF) .

Brief summary in scientific language

As part of a posterior stabilization of the lumbar spine, dorsal transpedicular screws have to be implanted in the vertebral body as well as cages into the intervertebral disc space. For this purpose, x-ray-based imaging techniques are used. Since X-rays are ionizing and have potentially damaging effect on tissue, sparse use of X-rays is crucial. The traditional open surgical technique for spinal stabilization (open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, OTLIF) includes a long incision in the back, pushing off of the paraspinal musculature and thus provide an open view on the posterior spinal structures in order to introduce the implants. Currently, minimally invasive surgical techniques (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, MIS TLIF) are increasingly used. It could be shown that MIS TLIF provides smaller incisions, reduced muscle trauma, infrequently healing disorders and infections, lower intraoperative blood loss, a less frequent application of a wound drainage, a reduced need for opioids, earlier mobilization and an earlier discharge from the hospital compared to OTLIF. Due to the lack of intraoperative visualization of the posterior spine in MIS TLIF, an increased use of x-rays is required, which can lead to an increased radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff, and patient. In addition, the intraoperative 3D navigation is a new development of modern imaging techniques. Goals of the intraoperative 3D navigation are higher accuracy, reduced radiation exposure and possibly shorter operation time. In a cadaver study, MIS TLIF using the navigation-assisted fluoroscopy was found to exhibit less radiation exposure of the operator compared with conventional fluoroscopy. However, there are no systematic comparative studies of the radiation exposure performing MIS TLIF in patients. In the Department of Neurosurgery of the University Hospital in Freiburg, MIS TLIF have been performed routinely for years using the conventional fluoroscopy and 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation. With conventional fluoroscopy, X-ray images can visualize the minimally invasive introduced instruments and implants. With the 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation, an automated intraoperative 3D navigation data set is created from X-ray images. These X-rays were made in the absence of the operating room staff. Subsequently, the minimally invasive introduced instruments can be visualized in the 3D navigation data set on the screen of the navigation system. Herewith, the spine can be instrumented precisely without exposing operating room staff and patient to further X-rays. This study is a comparative study of the radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient, and of the radiological and clinical outcomes in mono- and bisegmental MIS TLIF using the following intraoperative imaging techniques: - Conventional fluoroscopy (FLUORO group) - 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (NAV group)

Health condition or problem studied

ICD10:
M53.26
ICD10:
M43.16
ICD10:
M43.17
ICD10:
M43.06
ICD10:
M47.26
Healthy volunteers:
No Entry

Interventions, Observational Groups

Arm 1:
Conventional fluoroscopy (FLUORO group)
Arm 2:
3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (NAV group)

Endpoints

Primary outcome:
Radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient per monosegmental MIS TLIF in the FLUORO and NAV group (measured with dosimeters)
Secondary outcome:
- Radiation exposure of patients with bisegmental MIS TLIF in the FLUORO and NAV group - Radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient depending on the body mass index (BMI) of patients in the FLUORO and NAV group - Radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient per MIS TLIF with or without cement augmentation - Clinical outcome (examination findings, questionnaires), fusion rate (follow-up, 12 months) - Comparison of the accuracy of pedicle screws in the FLUORO and NAV group - Comparison of the parameters of the sagittal balance (C7 plumb line, segmental / lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence) between follow-up (12 months) and preoperatively in the FLUORO and NAV group in lateral X-rays

Study Design

Purpose:
Treatment
Retrospective/prospective:
No Entry
Study type:
Non-interventional
Longitudinal/cross-sectional:
No Entry
Study type non-interventional:
No Entry

Recruitment

Recruitment Status:
Recruiting complete, study complete
Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
No Entry

Recruitment Locations

Recruitment countries:
  • Germany
Number of study centers:
Monocenter study
Recruitment location(s):
  • University medical center Neurochirurgische Klinik Freiburg im Breisgau

Recruitment period and number of participants

Planned study start date:
2013-02-01
Actual study start date:
2013-02-07
Planned study completion date:
No Entry
Actual Study Completion Date:
2016-11-25
Target Sample Size:
55
Final Sample Size:
50

Inclusion Criteria

Sex:
All
Minimum Age:
18 Years
Maximum Age:
no maximum age
Additional Inclusion Criteria:
• Full age to competent patients with planned mono- or bisegmental MIS TLIF between LWK 2 and SWK 1 due to degeneration and / or instability including spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade I and II. • Both imaging techniques are considered suitable for MIS TLIF. • No improvement in symptoms for at least 3 months under conservative treatment. • Pain score (VAS for low back pain) of at least 3/10.

Exclusion Criteria

• Previous surgery in the affected or directly adjacent vertebral segment. • Spondylodiscitis, traumatic instability, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, neoplastic disease of the operating segment(s), spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade III and IV. • Indication for stabilization > 2 segments. • One of the imaging techniques is not considered suitable for MIS TLIF. • Scoliosis with a Cobb angle > 10 ° in the operating segment(s).

Addresses

Primary Sponsor

Address:
Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
Dr. med. Jan-Helge Klingler
Breisacher Str. 64
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49 761 270 50010
Fax:
+49 761 270 50080
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/neurochirurgie/live/index.html
Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
Yes

Contact for Scientific Queries

Address:
Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
Dr. med. Jan-Helge Klingler
Breisacher Str. 64
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49 761 270 50010
Fax:
+49 761 270 50080
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/neurochirurgie/live/index.html

Contact for Public Queries

Address:
Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
Dr. med. Jan-Helge Klingler
Breisacher Str. 64
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49 761 270 50010
Fax:
+49 761 270 50080
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/neurochirurgie/live/index.html

Principal Investigator

Address:
Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
Dr. med. Jan-Helge Klingler
Breisacher Str. 64
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49 761 270 50010
Fax:
+49 761 270 50080
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/neurochirurgie/live/index.html

Sources of Monetary or Material Support

Private sponsorship (foundations, study societies, etc.)

Address:
Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft Freiburg
Löwenstr. 16, Haus "Zur Lieben Hand"
79098 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
(0761) 203-5190
Fax:
(0761) 203-8720
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.wissges.uni-freiburg.de

Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)

Address:
Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
Breisacher Str. 64
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49 761 270 50010
Fax:
+49 761 270 50080
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
http://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/neurochirurgie/live/index.html

Ethics Committee

Address Ethics Committee

Address:
Ethik-Kommission der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Engelberger Str. 21
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Telephone:
+49-761-27072600
Fax:
+49-761-27072630
Contact per E-Mail:
Contact per E-Mail
URL:
No Entry

Vote of leading Ethics Committee

Vote of leading Ethics Committee
Date of ethics committee application:
2012-10-22
Ethics committee number:
431/12
Vote of the Ethics Committee:
Approved
Date of the vote:
2012-11-05

Further identification numbers

Other primary registry ID:
No Entry
EudraCT Number:
No Entry
UTN (Universal Trial Number):
No Entry
EUDAMED Number:
No Entry

IPD - Individual Participant Data

Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
No Entry
IPD Sharing Plan:
No Entry

Study protocol and other study documents

Study protocols:
No Entry
Study abstract:
No Entry
Other study documents:
No Entry
Background literature:
No Entry
Related DRKS studies:
No Entry

Publication of study results

Planned publication:
No Entry
Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
Studienprotokoll
PubMed - Abstract
PubMed - Abstract
Date of first publication of study results:
No Entry
DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
No Entry

Basic reporting

Basic Reporting / Results tables:
No Entry
Brief summary of results:
No Entry