Patient satisfaction in the Emergency Department
Organizational Data
- DRKS-ID:
- DRKS00010654
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study complete
- Date of registration in DRKS:
- 2016-06-21
- Last update in DRKS:
- 2023-01-11
- Registration type:
- Prospective
Acronym/abbreviation of the study
HappiER
URL of the study
No Entry
Brief summary in lay language
In the past, the role of the patient changed from passive recipients to sceptical consumer of medical services. Multiple studies concerning this matter exist already in international literature. However, none of the papers covers the specific study group of outpatients in a German accident and emergency department (A&E Department) with the intended survey techniques. Another aspect showing the relevance of this issue is the fact that a pleased patient will presumably opt again for a hospital treatment (that) he was satisfied with during his last visit. Other researchers assume that satisfaction has an impact on a repeated utilisation of an institution. The evaluation of patient satisfaction is still an essential part of quality management of patient care and it is amongst others demanded by the “gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss” (G-BA). Furthermore, patient satisfaction can be used as a measure of the success of the implementations of actions. A particular difficulty is that “patient satisfaction” is an entirely subjective perception and experience of a patient, whereby the accuracy and validity of a measurement can be affected. Considering all these aspects, it has become all the more important for attending physicians to deal with the issue of patient satisfaction. Despite the above shown general significance of patient satisfaction, barely any relevant publications exist, considering especially the interdisciplinary A&E Department. In this study two different kinds of surveys relating to patient satisfaction are to be tested: A questionnaire with "conventional, closed" questions, and the so-called "willingness to pay" method. A final argument for regular patient surveys is the higher compliance of satisfied patients with recommended therapies. Therefore, from a medical point of view it seems important that the patient leaves the emergency room satisfied. To ensure this, a prognosis model is to be developed which identifies potentially dissatisfied patients using routine data / process data (or a pain anamnesis) of patient care. If this step succeeds, the attending team would be able to initiate pre-emptively active countermeasures such as special education or explanation. Objectives of the study and expected clinical use 1. Validation of a questionnaire with the conventional question style aiming at distinguish dissatisfied from satisfied patients of an A&E Department. 2. Verification of the conformity of the results of the newly developed questionnaire with the new "willingness to pay" - method, based on the recording of patient satisfaction. 3. Development of a prognosis model to predict patient satisfaction, using process and routine data of intra clinical care in an emergency room
Brief summary in scientific language
In the past, the role of the patient changed from passive recipients to sceptical consumer of medical services. Multiple studies concerning this matter exist already in international literature. However, none of the papers covers the specific study group of outpatients in a German accident and emergency department (A&E Department) with the intended survey techniques. Another aspect showing the relevance of this issue is the fact that a pleased patient will presumably opt again for a hospital treatment (that) he was satisfied with during his last visit. According to Pukies et al., in the US, researchers assume that satisfaction has an impact on a repeated utilisation of an institution. The evaluation of patient satisfaction is still an essential part of quality management of patient care and it is amongst others demanded by the “gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss” (G-BA). Furthermore, patient satisfaction can be used as a measure of the success of the implementations of actions. A particular difficulty is that “patient satisfaction” is an entirely subjective perception and experience of a patient, whereby the accuracy and validity of a measurement can be affected. Considering all these aspects, it has become all the more important for attending physicians to deal with the issue of patient satisfaction. According to Leimkuehler et al., it is proven that the subjective perspective is of great significance for the treatment process and for a stronger patient orientation. Despite the above shown general significance of patient satisfaction, barely any relevant publications exist, considering especially the interdisciplinary A&E Department. In this study two different kinds of surveys relating to patient satisfaction are to be tested: A questionnaire with "conventional, closed" questions (Likert scale), and the so-called "willingness to pay" method. In this context, the latter is a new method of survey. So far it has mostly been used for product review and evaluation. In medicine it was used for e.g. the evaluation of different treatments of Angina Pectoris symptoms, psoriasis or as nausea and vomiting in the postoperative period (PONV). A final argument for regular patient surveys is the higher compliance of satisfied patients with recommended therapies. Therefore, from a medical point of view it seems important that the patient leaves the emergency room satisfied. To ensure this, a prognosis model is to be developed which identifies potentially dissatisfied patients using routine data / process data (or a pain anamnesis) of patient care. If this step succeeds, the attending team would be able to initiate pre-emptively active countermeasures such as special education or explanation. Objectives of the study and expected clinical use 1. Validation of a questionnaire with the conventional question style aiming at distinguish dissatisfied from satisfied patients of an A&E Department. 2. Verification of the conformity of the results of the newly developed questionnaire with the new "willingness to pay" - method, based on the recording of patient satisfaction. 3. Development of a prognosis model to predict patient satisfaction, using process and routine data of intra clinical care in an emergency room
Health condition or problem studied
- Free text:
- all not-admitted patients of an Emergency-Department
- Healthy volunteers:
- No Entry
Interventions, Observational Groups
- Arm 1:
- After finishing their treatment, all patients of an Emergency Department are asked if they whant to be part of the study. If they agree, an independent investigator determins the patients satisfaction unsing a standardized questionary. Until April 2017 only ambulant (non-admitted) patients have been included. Since April 2017 all patients are included.
Endpoints
- Primary outcome:
- Determination of patient satisfaction. An investigator uses a standardized questionary after the treatment in the ED is finished. The questionary contains of likert type questions as well as willingness to pay questions.
- Secondary outcome:
- development of a prognostic model (score) to determine if a patient will be unhappy with the treatment in the ED
Study Design
- Purpose:
- Health care system
- Retrospective/prospective:
- No Entry
- Study type:
- Non-interventional
- Longitudinal/cross-sectional:
- No Entry
- Study type non-interventional:
- No Entry
Recruitment
- Recruitment Status:
- Recruiting complete, study complete
- Reason if recruiting stopped or withdrawn:
- No Entry
Recruitment Locations
- Recruitment countries:
-
- Germany
- Number of study centers:
- Monocenter study
- Recruitment location(s):
-
- Medical center Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, akademische Krankenhaus der Universität Ulm Ulm
Recruitment period and number of participants
- Planned study start date:
- 2016-07-01
- Actual study start date:
- 2016-07-01
- Planned study completion date:
- No Entry
- Actual Study Completion Date:
- 2018-02-01
- Target Sample Size:
- 3000
- Final Sample Size:
- 471
Inclusion Criteria
- Sex:
- All
- Minimum Age:
- 16 Years
- Maximum Age:
- 120 Years
- Additional Inclusion Criteria:
- INCLUSION CRITERIA (AND) - Until April 2017: ambulant patient of the emergency department of the Bundeswehr Hospital Ulm, Germany - Since April 2017: all atient of the emergency department of the Bundeswehr Hospital Ulm, Germany - verbal agreement of all employees of the emergency department in the corresponding shift - patient age > 15 years - patient must understand the content and the propose of the study - patient must be able to agree to the study - written consent of the patient that he / she agrees to the study
Exclusion Criteria
EXCLUSION CRITERIA (OR) - refusal of the patient - refusal of the employee of the emergency department - patient is part of an other clinical trail - cognitive deficits of the patient / patient is not able to understand the content of the study - patient does not understand the Germany langue - Until April 2017: patient is admitted to the hospital
Addresses
Primary Sponsor
- Address:
- Bundeswehrkrankenhaus UlmKlinik für Anästhesie und IntensivmedizinSektion NotfallmedizinProf. Dr. Matthias HelmOberer Eselsberg 4089081 UlmGermany
- Telephone:
- 0049 (0731) 1710 26501
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
- Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT):
- Yes
Contact for Scientific Queries
- Address:
- Bundeswehrkrankenhaus UlmKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und SchmerztherapieProf. Dr. Martin KullaOberer Eselsberg 4089081 UlmGermany
- Telephone:
- 0049 151 65613966
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Contact for Public Queries
- Address:
- Bundeswehrkrankenhaus UlmKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und SchmerztherapieProf. Dr. Martin KullaOberer Eselsberg 4089081 UlmGermany
- Telephone:
- 0049 151 65613966
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Principal Investigator
- Address:
- Bundeswehrkrankenhaus UlmKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und SchmerztherapieProf. Dr. Martin KullaOberer Eselsberg 4089081 UlmGermany
- Telephone:
- 0049 151 65613966
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Sources of Monetary or Material Support
Public funding institutions financed by tax money/Government funding body (German Research Foundation (DFG), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), etc.)
- Address:
- Bundesministerium für Verteidigung Sanitätsakademie der Bundeswehr Wehrmedizinische Sonderforschung Abteilung EProjekt ID: SoFo: 37K3-S-20 1618Ingolstädter Str. 24080939 MünchenGermany
- Telephone:
- No Entry
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Institutional budget, no external funding (budget of sponsor/PI)
- Address:
- Bundeswehrkrankenhaus UlmKlinik für Anästhesie und IntensivmedizinSektion NotfallmedizinOberer Eselsberg 4089081 UlmGermany
- Telephone:
- 0049 (0731) 1710 26501
- Fax:
- No Entry
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Ethics Committee
Address Ethics Committee
- Address:
- Ethikkommission der Universität UlmHelmholtzstr. 2089081 UlmGermany
- Telephone:
- +49-731-50022050
- Fax:
- +49-731-50022036
- Contact per E-Mail:
- Contact per E-Mail
- URL:
- No Entry
Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Vote of leading Ethics Committee
- Date of ethics committee application:
- 2015-10-01
- Ethics committee number:
- 352/15
- Vote of the Ethics Committee:
- Approved
- Date of the vote:
- 2016-06-02
Further identification numbers
- Other primary registry ID:
- No Entry
- EudraCT Number:
- No Entry
IPD - Individual Participant Data
- Do you plan to make participant-related data (IPD) available to other researchers in an anonymized form?:
- No
- IPD Sharing Plan:
- No Entry
Study protocol and other study documents
- Study protocols:
- No Entry
- Study abstract:
- No Entry
- Other study documents:
- No Entry
- Background literature:
- No Entry
- Related DRKS studies:
- No Entry
Publication of study results
- Planned publication:
- No Entry
- Publikationen/Studienergebnisse:
- Rauscher Franziska. Zufriedenheit ambulanter Patienten in einer zentralen Notaufnahme HappiER17. Dissertation. Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Ulm. 2020
- Doll David. Zufriedenheit ambulanter Patienten in einer zentralen Notaufnahme. Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Ulm. 2022
- Date of first publication of study results:
- No Entry
- DRKS entry published for the first time with results:
- No Entry
Basic reporting
- Basic Reporting / Results tables:
- No Entry
- Brief summary of results:
- No Entry